Narrow VEBs & Trifascicular Block
Report:
Sinus rhythm 85/min
Second degree AV block, unspecified
VEBs in bigeminy
Right axis deviation +120o
Left posterior hemiblock
Right bundle branch block
Comment:
Itâs best to observe the bigeminal VEBs in the rhythm strip: no two are the same. Not only that â they look more normal than the conducted sinus beats, the latter widened by the RBBB + LPHB. Are they fusion beats?
It is a general rule that a fusion beatâs PR interval must not be shorter than the basic sinus PR interval by more than 0.06â â it only takes this long to completely capture the ventricles. This case is an exception â the RBBB + LPHB make ventricular capture much more prolonged. There is less objection here to PR interval shrinking from 0.28â for conducted sinus beats to 0.14â for fusion beats â but itâs still too much. The fusion here also means that the first degree block is not in the AV node â otherwise the VEB would be complete before the sinus impulse could even begin to depolarise the ventricles. It would also be very interesting to speculate where the VEBs, precisely, come from. Most likely, they come from somewhere in the septal region, activating the two ventricles almost synchronously, with variable differential conduction in the two fascicles of the left bundle branch. This, rather than fusion, is the real explanation for their different shapes. Do they arise beyond the level of the blocks? Yes, most likely they do: the blocks could in fact reside in the bundle of His itself.
The nature of the previous 2:1 AV block is now difficult to define, beyond the general designation of second degree AV block. The VEBs themselves can induce advanced AV block67, but that variety is beyond standard classifications. Even then, is this block advanced (less than 50% conduction)? That depends on whether there is fusion or not. If there is, there is overall 3:2 conduction!
Below (Fig 404a) is a similar trace, but with uniform, also narrow, VEBs.
Fig 404a.
Fig 405. 62 year old lady following reversal of muscle relaxant by 5mg neostigmine and 0.3 mg atropine.
If you have any suggestions for or feedback on this report, please let us know.
Hi, can we chat about some terms and conditions?
The library and its records are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
By clicking agree below, you are agreeing to adhere to CC BY 4.0.